CHEN operates a blog and wishes to use the ChatGPT chatbot to generate articles in order to increase blog traffic and earn more advertising or sponsorship revenue. Some people may question whether using ChatGPT to generate articles would infringe copyright. In fact, this depends on the content of the generated articles and whether there is a copyright in the original works。
Introduction to ChatGPT.
ChatGPT is a large language model developed by OpenAI, based on the GPT-3.5 architecture. It can automatically answer user questions, engage in conversational interactions, generate text, and is one of the most advanced natural language processing technologies available today. ChatGPT’s training data includes a vast amount of natural language text, enabling it to learn the structure and semantics of natural language and generate high-quality natural language text. ChatGPT has a wide range of applications, including intelligent customer service, virtual assistants, automatic translation, and machine writing, among others.。
- ChatGPT is a type of chatbot that utilizes natural language processing technology to generate textual content.
- Applications of ChatGPT include automated email responses, article generation, machine translation, and more.
- The generated results from ChatGPT often come close to or even surpass human performance, which has led to widespread attention and practical value.
- As ChatGPT’s generated output is based on a vast amount of existing language data, it has also raised relevant ethical and legal questions, such as copyright and intellectual property rights, among others.
Interpretation from TIPO(brief)
1. ChatGPT operates through text-based conversations and is enhanced through human training intervention to improve its machine learning capabilities. It works in conjunction with human instructions and keywords to rearrange or regenerate the vast amount of data it has stored using AI technology.
2. Due to ChatGPT’s storage and recombination of the content of others’ works, as well as its distribution to the public via the internet, and the works it generates, it may involve acts of reproduction and public transmission of others’ works under Articles 22 and 26-1 of copyright law. Given that ChatGPT does not create its own content and its actions involve the extensive use of others’ works, it may not be able to claim fair use. Therefore, obtaining consent or authorization from the copyright owner is necessary, or else it may infringe upon copyright property rights.
3. On the contrary, if the articles generated using ChatGPT are entirely original and do not contain any materials from others, then these articles do not infringe on copyright. In other words, the data content stored by ChatGPT, if it possesses originality and creativity, is considered a work protected by copyright law.
In summary, ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence model developed by OpenAI, and it, in itself, does not hold copyrights. However, if someone like 小承 uses articles generated by ChatGPT for commercial purposes, it may raise copyright issues with the original authors. When using ChatGPT-generated content for other commercial value, it also involves the aforementioned use of others’ work issues. It’s advisable for CHEN to confirm whether ChatGPT has obtained authorization from the copyright owners and whether it has the rights to sublicense for others to use, to avoid potential copyright infringement issues.
Our Perception
Articles generated using ChatGPT should ensure that their content is entirely original and should not directly copy paragraphs or phrasing from other people’s articles. The generated articles should align with the theme of the blog and provide value and appeal to attract more readers. To reduce the risk of copyright infringement, CHEN should attribute and quote parts of other people’s articles when used and ensure compliance with copyright and intellectual property laws.
Therefore, if CHEN intends to use ChatGPT to generate articles, he should be mindful not to directly copy paragraphs or phrasing from other people’s articles, nor should he adapt the content of others. He should ensure that the generated articles are entirely original or obtain the required content through other lawful means, such as citing or summarizing other people’s viewpoints. If CHEN is unsure about the legality of his actions, he should seek professional advice to mitigate the risk of copyright infringement.
Source : TIPO
「姓名標示─非商業性─禁止改作」授權條款臺灣3.0版
本著作採「創用CC」之授權模式，僅限於非營利、禁止改作且標示著作人姓名之條件下，得利用本著作。
Author
吳靜芸 Gena Wu
商標專員